Q-RUSH Hysterectomy: A Mini Review of a Novel, Rapid, and Vault-Supportive Modification of Traditional Total Abdominal Hysterectomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i11.2080Keywords:
Hysterectomy, Operative Time, Postoperative Complications, Surgical Procedures, Operative, Uterine ProlapseAbstract
Background: Total abdominal hysterectomy often requires multiple sequential pedicle clamps and separate vault suspension steps, which can prolong operative time, increase surgeon fatigue, and result in variable apical support. Optimizing both operative efficiency and post-hysterectomy vault support remains a key surgical priority. Objective: To describe the conceptual basis, surgical rationale, and potential advantages of Qudsia's Rapid Unified Suspension Hysterectomy (Q-RUSH) technique as an innovative modification of total abdominal hysterectomy. Methods: This mini-review synthesizes the development and operative concept of Q-RUSH, which streamlines pedicle management and incorporates uterosacral–transcervical ligament suspension into a single, continuous suture technique. Relevant literature on total abdominal hysterectomy, apical suspension, and prevention of post-hysterectomy vault prolapse was narratively reviewed to contextualize Q-RUSH within current practice. Early pilot experience from its use in a tertiary care setting was examined descriptively with respect to operative workflow, hemostatic control, and urinary tract safety; no formal hypothesis testing or comparative statistical analysis was undertaken. Results: Q-RUSH conceptually reduces the number of separate pedicle clamps and consolidates apical support into an integrated suspension step, which appears to shorten operative workflow and lessen intraoperative handling. Early pilot observations indicate meaningful time savings with maintained hemostasis and no evident compromise in urinary tract safety. By providing immediate, anatomically anchored apical support via a continuous uterosacral–transcervical suspension, Q-RUSH may help reduce the risk of post-hysterectomy vault prolapse. However, this requires confirmation in prospective comparative studies with long-term follow-up. Conclusion: Q-RUSH represents a promising modification of total abdominal hysterectomy that unifies pedicle control and apical suspension in a single continuous technique, with the potential to improve operative efficiency and apical support. Robust prospective trials with adequate sample size, standardized outcome measures, and long-term follow-up are needed to validate its safety profile and efficacy in preventing post-hysterectomy vault prolapse.
Downloads
References
Aarts JWM, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Tavender E, Garry R, Mol BWJ, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;(8): CD003677. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5
Mou T, Brown O, Das D, Mueller MG, Kenton KS, Bretschneider CE. Postoperative complications after abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy for uteri weighing 250 grams or less. Gynecol Pelvic Med. 2023;6:3. https://doi.org/10.21037/gpm-22-44
Patel UJ, Heisler CA. Urinary tract injury during gynecologic surgery: prevention, recognition, and management. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2021 Sep;48(3):535-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2021.05.007
Mamik MM, Antosh DD, White DE, Myers EM, Abernethy M, Rahimi S, et al. Risk factors for lower urinary tract injury at the time of hysterectomy for benign reasons. Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Aug;25(8):1031-1036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2308-3
Coolen AWM, Dietz V, Bui BN, Wang R, van Montfoort APA, Mol BWJ, et al. The treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Dec;28(12):1767-1783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3493-2
Kansaria HJ, Chouhan T. Study of post-hysterectomy vault prolapse and surgical management. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2023 Oct;73(Suppl 1):124-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-023-01757-9
Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;(4): CD004014. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub5
Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Brown J. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 1;10(10): CD012376. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012376.pub2
Carlin GL, Bodner-Adler B, Husslein H, Hanzal E, Koelbl H, Laml T, et al. The effectiveness of surgical procedures to prevent post-hysterectomy pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review of the literature. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(4):775-783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04572-2
Iglesia CB, Smithling KR. Pelvic organ prolapse. Am Fam Physician. 2017 Aug 1;96(3):179-185. (DOI not available)
Asati P, Asati S, Sinha V, Dixit H, Mahajan A, Alraddadi YK, Syed AK. Evaluation of the efficacy and complications of different hysterectomy techniques in the management of uterine fibroids. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3): S2428-S2430. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_236_24
Im H, Ahn S, Kim K, Kim MK, Park JY, Chang HK, Seong SJ, Hwang JH. Surgical time in gynecologic surgery using laparoscopic articulated instruments (KGOG 4002). Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2025 Sep;68(5):401-407. https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.25076
Kim EK, et al. Prophylactic apical suspension at the time of hysterectomy for benign, non-prolapse indications: predictors of performing procedure and associated complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(3 Suppl):S864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.12.115
Lowder JL. Apical vaginal support: the often forgotten piece of the puzzle. Mo Med. 2017 May-Jun;114(3):171-175.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Qudsia Nawaz, Sadia A. Ghaffar, Maliha Khawar, Siddiqa Batool Naqvi, Shazia Shakeel, Neha Tanvir, Ayesha Tanvir, Humaira Tabassum

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

