Diagnostic Accuracy of First-Trimester Uterine Artery Pulsatility Index in Predicting Preeclampsia Among Primigravida
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i6.2023Keywords:
Pregabalin, Hemodynamics, PneumoperitoneumAbstract
Preeclampsia (PE) remains a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early prediction using first-trimester uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) has been proposed to identify women at risk, but its diagnostic performance in low-risk primigravidae remains uncertain. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of first-trimester mean UtA-PI for predicting PE among primigravidae and to describe associated maternal and neonatal outcomes. Methods: We conducted a prospective diagnostic-accuracy study in primigravida women at 11+0–13+6 weeks. Bilateral UtA Doppler was performed and mean UtA-PI and MoM were recorded. Participants were followed to delivery; PE was ascertained using standard criteria. Group comparisons used Welch’s t-test for continuous variables and chi-square/Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using a predefined threshold (UtA-PI MoM ≥2.5) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Of 160 women, 8 (5.0%) developed PE. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except higher pre-scan diastolic BP in women who later developed PE (76.88 ± 4.22 vs 71.88 ± 8.23 mmHg; p = 0.0121). First-trimester mean UtA-PI and MoM were not significantly different between PE and non-PE groups (both p > 0.39). Peak SBP/DBP during pregnancy were higher in PE (141.38 ± 12.35 vs 121.68 ± 11.22 mmHg, p = 0.0025; 104.38 ± 6.25 vs 76.78 ± 8.87 mmHg, p < 0.0001). Using UtA-PI MoM ≥2.5, there were 0 true positives, 0 false positives, 8 false negatives, and 152 true negatives (sensitivity 0.0%, specificity 100.0%, NPV 95.0%, accuracy 95.0%). ROC analysis for mean UtA-PI MoM showed limited discrimination (AUC = 0.585). Conclusions: In this primigravida cohort, first-trimester mean UtA-PI demonstrated limited standalone predictive value for PE, while adverse maternal hemodynamics and neonatal outcomes were evident among PE cases. Screening strategies should consider gestational-age–specific centiles and integration with clinical/biochemical markers rather than UtA-PI alone.
Downloads
References
Mönckeberg M, Arias V, Fuenzalida R, Álvarez S, Toro V, Calvo A, et al. Diagnostic performance of first-trimester screening of preeclampsia based on uterine artery pulsatility index and maternal risk factors in routine clinical use. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;10(4):182. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10040182
Shivrayan S, Agarwal R, Paliwal V, Vaishnav G. Role of first-trimester uterine artery pulsatility index as a predictor of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sawai Man Singh Medical College, Jaipur. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2022;11(11):3110–3114. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20222804
Karpagam RK, Soundarapandian RS, Vishnubala V, Nithyanandam S. Role of uterine artery Doppler study between 11 and 14 weeks as a predictor of preeclampsia. Cureus. 2024;16(7):e63591. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.63591
Cerdeira AS, O’Sullivan J, Ohuma EO, James T, Papageorghiou AT, Knight M, et al. Ruling out preeclampsia in the next 4 weeks using a soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1/placental growth factor ratio ≤ 38: secondary analysis of the INSPIRE study in women with suspected preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226(3):443–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.1345
Shajihan A, Sharma G, et al. Is it time for precision screening in preeclampsia? JACC Adv. 2025;4(3):101585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccadv.2024.101585
Zhu C, Xu C-J, Wu J-N, Zhao W, Hu Y-L, Yao Y, et al. Association between abnormal uterine artery pulsatility index and the risk of fetal congenital heart defects: a hospital-based cohort study. Sci Rep. 2023;13:22924. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50167-4
Cnossen JS, Morris RK, ter Riet G, et al. Use of uterine artery Doppler ultrasonography to predict pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review and bivariable meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2008;178(6):701–711. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.070430
Velauthar L, Plana MN, Kalidindi M, et al. First-trimester uterine artery Doppler and adverse pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis of 55,974 women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43(5):500–507. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.13275
Gómez O, Figueras F, Fernández S, et al. Reference ranges for uterine artery mean pulsatility index at 11–41 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32(2):128–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.5315
Chaemsaithong P, Sahota DS, Poon LC. First-trimester preeclampsia screening and prediction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;S1071–S1097.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.07.020
Audibert F, Boucoiran I, An N, et al. Screening for preeclampsia using first-trimester serum markers and uterine artery Doppler in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):383.e1–383.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.014
North RA, McCowan LME, Dekker GA, et al. Clinical risk prediction for pre-eclampsia in nulliparous women: development of model in international prospective cohort. BMJ. 2011;342:d1875. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d1875
Kleinrouweler CE, Bossuyt PMM, Thilaganathan B, et al. Value of adding second-trimester uterine artery Doppler to patient characteristics in identification of nulliparous women at increased risk for pre-eclampsia: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(3):257–267. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.12435
Akolekar R, Syngelaki A, Sarquis R, Zvanca M, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of early, intermediate and late pre-eclampsia from maternal factors, biophysical and biochemical markers at 11–13 weeks. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31(1):66–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.2660
Fox R, Kitt J, Leeson P, Aye CYL, Lewandowski AJ. Preeclampsia: risk factors, diagnosis, management, and the cardiovascular impact on the offspring. J Clin Med. 2019;8(10):1625. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8101625
Bartsch E, Medcalf KE, Park AL, Ray JG; High Risk of Pre-eclampsia Identification Group. Clinical risk factors for pre-eclampsia determined in early pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis of large cohort studies. BMJ. 2016;353:i1753. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1753
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Shan E Zahra, Mahjabeen Mahmood Kamal, Muhammad Wasim Awan, Fatima Tuz Zahra, Bushra Ishtiaq, Shaghaf Iqbal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

