Diagnostic Accuracy of CT Angiography in Stable Patients Suspected of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i7.1899Keywords:
Angiography, Coronary; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Multidetector Computed TomographyAbstract
Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Accurate diagnosis in stable patients at high risk of obstructive CAD is critical for timely intervention. While invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is the gold standard, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is increasingly being used as a non-invasive alternative with promising diagnostic value and fewer procedural risks. Objective: To analyze and compare the diagnostic accuracy and safety of CCTA and ICA in stable patients at high risk of obstructive CAD. Methods: A prospective study was conducted in the Department of Cardiology, Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore, between May 2023 to May 2025. Eligible patients included those with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% and typical angina symptoms, with pre-test probability of obstructive CAD between 50–85% along with a positive functional test, or >85% regardless of functional testing. A total of 100 patients were consecutively enrolled and divided equally: Group A (n=50) underwent CCTA, and Group B (n=50) underwent ICA. Outcomes were evaluated for diagnostic utility, frequency of non-actionable procedures, and safety endpoints. Statistical analysis included chi-square testing and comparison of proportions, with p<0.05 considered significant. Results: Use of CCTA significantly reduced the rate of invasive procedures by 65% (p<0.0001) and decreased non-actionable ICAs by 90% (p<0.0001). At one-year follow-up, major adverse cardiac outcomes—including mortality, acute coronary syndrome, urgent revascularization, stroke, and cardiac-related hospital admission—were observed in 20 (40%) patients in Group A and 21 (42%) in Group B (p=0.91). Conclusion: CCTA provides a safe and effective alternative to ICA for diagnosing obstructive CAD in stable high-risk patients, reducing unnecessary invasive procedures without compromising clinical outcomes.
Downloads
References
Feldman DI, Latina J, Lovell J, Blumenthal RS, Arbab-Zadeh A, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2022;32(7):421–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcm.2021.08.009
Kheiri B, Simpson TF, Osman M, German DM, Fuss CS, Ferencik M, et al. Computed tomography vs invasive coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;15(12):2147–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.06.003
DISCHARGE Trial Group. Comparative effectiveness of initial computed tomography and invasive coronary angiography in women and men with stable chest pain and suspected coronary artery disease: multicentre randomised trial. BMJ. 2022;379:e071133. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-071133
Machado MF, Felix N, Melo PH, Gauza MM, Calomeni P, Generoso G, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography versus invasive coronary angiography in stable chest pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023;16(11):e015800. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.123.015800
Chan K, Wahome E, Tsiachristas A, Antonopoulos AS, Patel P, Lyasheva M, et al. Inflammatory risk and cardiovascular events in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease: the ORFAN multicentre, longitudinal cohort study. Lancet. 2024;403(10444):2606–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00596-8
Dimitriadis K, Pyrpyris N, Theofilis P, Mantzouranis E, Beneki E, Kostakis P, et al. Computed tomography angiography identified high-risk coronary plaques: from diagnosis to prognosis and future management. Diagnostics. 2024;14(15):1671. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14151671
Becker LM, Peper J, van Nes SH, van Es HW, Sjauw KD, van de Hoef TP, et al. Non-invasive physiological assessment of coronary artery obstruction on coronary computed tomography angiography. Neth Heart J. 2024;32(11):397–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-024-01902-7
Rasmussen LD, Schmidt SE, Knuuti J, Vrints C, Bøttcher M, Foldyna B, et al. Clinical risk prediction, coronary computed tomography angiography, and cardiovascular events in new-onset chest pain: the PROMISE and SCOT-HEART trials. Eur Heart J. 2025;46(5):473–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae742
Rudziński PN, Kruk M, Demkow M, Oleksiak A, Schoepf JU, Mach M, et al. Efficacy and safety of coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with a high clinical likelihood of obstructive coronary artery disease. Kardiol Pol. 2022;80(1):56–63. https://doi.org/10.33963/KP.a2021.0185
Serruys PW, Hara H, Garg S, Kawashima H, Nørgaard BL, Dweck MR, et al. Coronary computed tomographic angiography for complete assessment of coronary artery disease: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78(7):713–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.06.019
Schlattmann P, Wieske V, Bressem KK, Götz T, et al. The effectiveness of coronary computed tomography angiography and functional testing for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease: results from the individual patient data Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Cardiac CT (COME-CCT). Insights Imaging. 2024;15(1):208. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01702-y
Xie Q, Zhou L, Li Y, Zhang R, Wei H, Ma G, et al. Comparison of prognosis between coronary computed tomography angiography versus invasive coronary angiography for stable coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1010536. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1010536
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rizwan Ahmed Yaqoob, Muhammad Arshad, Ali Hameed
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
